UPDATE: State Supreme Court Affirms Rice Verdict, Declares Part of 'Tort Reform' Unconstitutional


by Jan Cottingham  on Thursday, Dec. 8, 2011 3:28 pm  

"These farmers have struggled mightily over the last five years after their crops were contaminated and the market crashed. They still struggle."

"The jury found Bayer's conduct in this whole rice fiasco to be egregious," Powell said. "And the trial court agreed and the Supreme Court agreed 7-0 as well."

Barry Deacon of Jonesboro, a lawyer for Riceland Foods Inc. of Stuttgart, echoed Powell's sentiments about the verdict, saying, "We are very pleased with the Arkansas Supreme Court decision today."

Riceland, a rice growers' cooperative, and Deacon have reason to be pleased.

In March, a Stuttgart jury in a separate case awarded Riceland $136.8 million in its lawsuit against Bayer CropScience over genetically modified rice.

The award was believed to be the largest in Arkansas history. The circuit court jury said Bayer CropScience owed Riceland $11.8 million in compensatory damages and $125 million in punitive damages.

At the time, Bayer CropScience expressed its disappointment with the verdict but noted that Arkansas law limits punitive damages to $1 million. In addition, the judge in that case ruled that the punitive damages cap was constitutional and that's how the judgment was entered.

Riceland, however, appealed the punitive damages cap and the high court's ruling certainly appears to support the farmers' cooperative.

"It's very good for us," Deacon said of the Supreme Court's ruling, though he noted other issues were on appeal.
 Asked, however, about Baker's comments, Deacon declined to comment.

The farmers' complaint against Bayer stems from the company's development of a genetically modified rice called LibertyLink. The rice, which hadn't been approved for human consumption, was found mixed in with regular rice seed on farms in Arkansas and Missouri.

Major global markets, particularly the European Union and Japan, refused to buy rice from Arkansas and other farmers in the U.S. after the tainted rice was discovered. The EU relented after tests were implemented to detect contamination by genetically modified organisms, or GMOs.

Arkansas grows about half the nation's rice, and farmers in the state, along with rice growers in California, Louisiana, Mississippi, Missouri and Texas, sued Bayer. The farmers alleged they'd sustained tremendous economic losses. In yet another case, U.S. rice farmers, including a number in Arkansas, and Bayer AG in July reached a $750 million settlement agreement over contamination of the U.S. rice supply by Bayer's genetically modified rice. Thursday's Supreme Court ruling has no bearing on that case.

The Arkansas General Assembly approved the Civil Justice Reform Act of 2003 after a Mena jury awarded $78 million — $63 million of that in punitive damages — to the family of a nursing home patient.

 

 

Please read our comments policy before commenting.