Wal-Mart Stores Inc. -- covered up with gender-bias lawsuits -- is asking a judge today to dimiss a suit by 11 women who say they suffered pay and promotion discrimination by the world's largest retailer.
Citing a 2011 U.S. Supreme Court ruling that shattered a planned national group lawsuit known as Dukes v. Wal-Mart, the company on Oct. 26 asked Fort Lauderdale, Florida, U.S. District Judge Robert N. Scola Jr. to reject the women’s bid to create a smaller, regional suit and asked him to limit participation in the case to those who brought it.
“The Supreme Court held that the Dukes plaintiffs could not proceed on behalf of a nationwide class, not because of its size, but because plaintiffs had failed to ‘establish the existence of any common question,’” the Bentonville, Arkansas- based company told Scola in its filing.
The Florida lawsuit was filed Oct. 4. There have been others recently, including one filed in Tennessee and another in Dallas. In its argument today, Wal-Mart notes that it employs 94,000 people in Florida alone.
Meanwhile the Dukes case -- originally filed back in 2001 -- is still pending.
- TV News People: Don't Mess with Drew Carey on Twitter
- FedEx Schedules Groundbreaking for Southwest Little Rock Site
- Inauguration Day in Arkansas
- How A Trans-Atlantic Investment Scam Ensnared Credit Union President Joyce Judy 19 hours ago
- Arkansas' Biggest Deals of 2014 Soar While Value Slips 19 hours ago
- Windstream Names Lewis Langston CIO, Adds Other Senior Leaders 10 hours ago
- In Arkansas, Rules Restrict e-Services By Physicians 19 hours ago
- Landowners Seek Ruling On Oil Firm's Eminent Domain Powers 3 days ago