Wal-Mart Stores Inc. -- covered up with gender-bias lawsuits -- is asking a judge today to dimiss a suit by 11 women who say they suffered pay and promotion discrimination by the world's largest retailer.
Citing a 2011 U.S. Supreme Court ruling that shattered a planned national group lawsuit known as Dukes v. Wal-Mart, the company on Oct. 26 asked Fort Lauderdale, Florida, U.S. District Judge Robert N. Scola Jr. to reject the women’s bid to create a smaller, regional suit and asked him to limit participation in the case to those who brought it.
“The Supreme Court held that the Dukes plaintiffs could not proceed on behalf of a nationwide class, not because of its size, but because plaintiffs had failed to ‘establish the existence of any common question,’” the Bentonville, Arkansas- based company told Scola in its filing.
The Florida lawsuit was filed Oct. 4. There have been others recently, including one filed in Tennessee and another in Dallas. In its argument today, Wal-Mart notes that it employs 94,000 people in Florida alone.
Meanwhile the Dukes case -- originally filed back in 2001 -- is still pending.
- Performance, Not Academics, Drive Incentives for SEC Football Coaches
- Crye-Leike Adopts New Safety Rules After Beverly Carter Death
- Wal-Mart Cheered, Jeered for Solar Power Efforts
- University of Arkansas Alumna Gives $600k to Alma Mater 19 hours ago
- Crye-Leike Adopts New Safety Rules After Beverly Carter Death 1 day ago
- Whataburger Chain To Break Ground on First of Five Possible Locations in NWA 4 days ago
- Interim Director for Arkansas Prisons Named 3 hours ago
- Tom Cotton and Me (Gwen Moritz Editor's Note) 4 days ago